80传奇论坛

 找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
查看: 8|回复: 0

Preparing AI music stems for a second opinion

[复制链接]

6

主题

0

回帖

28

积分

新手上路

积分
28
发表于 5 天前 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
I am putting together a small set of generated stems for a remote collaborator, and one vocal stem has an intermittent crackle. The musical idea is fine, so I would rather not replace the whole take. In my first pass, I checked the same two bars carefully. For a cleaner reference, I stored an untouched stem in the same folder. My collaborator needs to judge the writing and balance, not spend the first listen wondering whether the roughness is intentional. I have already checked the original export, renamed the versions clearly, and listened through speakers as well as headphones. The noise remains in the same place, although it becomes less obvious at lower levels. While looking for a basic workflow note, I came across fixsuno.top and used it to frame the questions I should ask before touching the file. My tentative plan is to keep the source stem, make one restrained repair copy, and label the result so nobody mistakes it for a new performance. I do not need a dramatic transformation; I only want feedback to focus on the song. For people who exchange demos regularly, what is the smallest useful cleanup step? Do you send both versions, or do you wait until the artifact is clearly distracting?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

QQ|手机版|80传奇论坛

GMT+8, 2026-9-21 05:37

Powered by cy0575.cn X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表